Electoral Strategy and Economic Policy
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper develops an approach to political equilibrium in a twoparty setting. The approach characterizes political resource allocation as trading o¤ the utility of core party supporters and swing voters, i.e. those who are not attached to either party. The model has three stages. First parties determine their electoral strategies. Second, an election is held. Third, policy is chosen. To illustrate the model at work, I apply it to two policy settings the standard spatial model and the distributive politics problem of targeting transfers to groups of voters. The latter application is particularly interesting since the game of electoral strategy that emerges is supermodular. The paper then briey discusses strategies for making political equilibria credible, how some of the key magnitudes suggested by the theory can be measured and the additional considerations that arise in dynamic models of political competition. This paper is based on the Walras-Bowley lecture presented at the World Congress of the Econometric Society in August 2005. Thanks to Paul Milgrom for some useful discussion following the lecture and to Jim Snyder and Xavier Vives for useful advice along the way. The paper draws on joint work with Anne Case, Steve Coate, Torsten Persson, Ian Preston and Daniel Sturm to whom I am grateful for their collaboration. I also thank Konrad Burchardi, Masa Kudamatsu and Juan-Pablo Rud for able research assistance.
منابع مشابه
Electoral Uncertainty and the Volatility of International Capital Flows∗
I study a small open economy in which electoral uncertainty affects and is affected by capital inflows. Two candidates, one favoring workers and another favoring entrepreneurs, run for office; the winner chooses tax policy, which affects investment returns. A pro labor electoral victory results in a "sudden stop" in investment and capital flows, reflecting a time inconsistency problem. While th...
متن کاملElectoral Bias and Policy Choice: Theory and Evidence
This paper develops an approach to studying how bias in favor of one party due to the pattern of electoral districting a¤ects policy choice. We tie a commonly used measure of electoral bias to the theory of party competition and show how this a¤ects party strategy in theory. The usefulness of the approach is illustrated using data on local government in England. The results suggest that reducin...
متن کاملPandering and electoral competition
We study an election with two perfectly informed candidates. Voters share common values over the policy outcome of the election, but possess arbitrarily little information about which policy is best for them. Voters elect one of the candidates, effectively choosing between the two policies proposed by the candidates. We explore under which conditions candidates always propose the voters’ optima...
متن کاملElectoral Competition with Privately Informed Candidates∗ (Preliminary)
We consider a model of elections in which two office-motivated candidates are uncertain about the location of the median voter’s ideal point, and in which candidates receive private signals about the location of the median prior to taking policy positions. Assuming signal spaces are finite, we show that there is at most one pure strategy equilibrium and give a sharp characterization, if one exi...
متن کاملMixed Strategy Equilibrium and Deep Covering in Multidimensional Electoral Competition
We prove existence of mixed strategy electoral equilibrium in the multidimensional Downsian model of elections. We do so by modelling voters explicitly as players, enabling us to resolve discontinuities in the game between the candidates, which have proved a barrier to existence. We then give a partial characterization: the supports of equilibrium mixed strategies must lie in the deep uncovered...
متن کامل